WPF Quick Tip: Converters as MarkupExtensions
Everybody's gotta love their IValueConverters, right? And not forgetting IMultiValueConverters too.
However, they're a bit of a pain when it comes to Xaml. I hate having to wonder all the way up to the resources section(!), create my converter, think of a name for the key and finally reference the converter through a StaticResource markup extension.
Another thing I hate is the parsing of Converter Parameters back into the appropriate type. Boo.
Not anymore with this quick tip. Hooray.
Take this MultiplyConverter (we've all written one of these):
public class MultiplyConverter : IValueConverter
{
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture)
{
double val = System.Convert.ToDouble(value);
double factor = System.Convert.ToDouble(parameter);
return val * factor;
}
public object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture)
{
// left as an exercise for the reader
// don't be a wimp, it's not hard
}
}
Which might be used something like...
<!-- somewhere in the resources -->
<local:MultiplyConverter x:Key="BarryTheConverter" />
<Rectangle Width="{Binding ElementName=otherElement, Path=(Canvas.Left), Converter={StaticResource BarryTheConverter}, ConverterParameter=-0.5}" />
Sort of yuck.
V2
I think it's a big improvement to forego the ConverterParameter and use a property on the Value Converter itself:
public class MultiplyConverter : IValueConverter
{
public double Factor { get; set; }
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture)
{
double val = System.Convert.ToDouble(value);
return val * Factor;
}
Which would be used like so...
<!-- somewhere in the resources -->
<local:MultiplyConverter Factor="-0.5" x:Key="BarryTheConverter" />
<Rectangle Width="{Binding ElementName=otherElement, Path=(Canvas.Left), Converter={StaticResource BarryTheConverter}}" />
A minor improvement IMO. But better nonetheless, provided we don't need to create lots of converters for all the different 'Factors' we might use... unless... we implement the Converter as a markup extension.
V3
public class MultiplyConverter : MarkupExtension, IValueConverter
{
public double Factor { get; set; }
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture)
{
double val = System.Convert.ToDouble(value);
return val * Factor;
}
public object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture)
{
// left as an exercise for the reader
// don't be a wimp, it's not hard
}
public override object ProvideValue(IServiceProvider serviceProvider)
{
return this;
}
}
Which might be used like so
<!-- no need for any resources in this case! -->
<Rectangle Width="{Binding ElementName=otherElement, Path=(Canvas.Left), Converter={local:MultiplyConverter Factor=-0.5}}" />
Much better and reads easier. Hooray!

Post By
Josh Twist
23:29
17 Apr 2009
» Next Post:
Improving Performance of images used with 3D
« Previous Post:
Cracking an XPS in WPF
Comments:
Posted by
Sven
@
18 Apr 2009
14:01
Sweet ! I see no reason not to "upgrade" all my existing converters to this state so I can choose whether to declare them as a resource or instantiate them inline withing the Converter={} clause.
I guess the disadvantage of this new instantiation method is that it creates a converter instance per Converter={} clause, right ?
Posted by
josh
@
18 Apr 2009
23:48
Yes, if you think of that as a disadvantage. Of course, WPF is object heavy so any saving here (in terms of reducing the number of objects) is going to be negligible.
Posted by
OAB
@
27 Apr 2009
07:26
Very cool. I had no idea it was that easy to write a markup extension. I will definitely be using this.
Posted by
sinan
@
24 Jul 2009
12:18
hey guys,
There is far simpler method of doing V3.
I am not inheriting from MarkupExtension class also,
Regular value converter.
Just use tags!! Not inline coding with curly braces.
As the following:
<Window.Title>
<Binding>
<Binding.Converter>
<ConverterEx:MyConverter MyParam="Sinan" />
</Binding.Converter>
</Binding>
</Window.Title>
class MyConverter:IValueConverter
{
public string MyParam { get; set; }
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture)
{
return MyParam;
}
public object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture)
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}
}
Any ideas?
Posted by
josh
@
25 Jul 2009
00:14
Hi sSinan,
I've always known of this approach but, to be brutally honest, I think it's even worse than using a StaticResource. I like the shorthand format that MarkupExtensions provide.
Thanks for posting though - it's a good point!
Josh
Posted by
Oliver
@
08 Sep 2009
01:29
The MarkExtension worked brilliantly! Thank you.
Posted by
Grant BlahaErath
@
15 Oct 2009
01:01
This is a great approach. You can define as many parameters as you need this way. No need to implement a tokenizer in your converter.